Google

WWW ViewOnline
 
 
 

Home | About Us | Contact Us | Archives | Classic ViewPoint Archives | VO Shop

 

Monday, January 23, 2006

Rolling over

When it comes to "civil liberties," I tend to want to play it a little "overly cautious." I think it's much better to scrutinize anything the government says it's doing for our own good than to blindly say, "Well, Papa knows best." And heck, I'm not alone in that. Listen to Sean Hannity or Larry Elder and you get the same perspective.


So I'm wondering about the phone tapping issue. My first instinct as a red-blooded American is to shake my fist at the idea of the government being able to tap my phone willy-nilly. No warrant? It's an excuse for abuse. But there's this other side of my personality that has heard the arguments - things like "we're only doing this on calls going over-seas" or "it's a matter of preventing another terrorist attack." Makes me want to just stand aside and let the good folks in DC do their jobs.


Except...


I was raised to believe that if you give an inch they'll take a mile. If we surrender even one fraction of a civil liberty it's gone. If we let the government have the complete and unquestioned authority to make a decision it will be for the government and not for the people. After all, everyone ultimately looks out for their own best interest. You can never trust someone else to decide what's right for you - especially not a collection of officials who as often as not accept bribes and other favors in exchange for a little "nudge" to the shaping of government policy.


No warrants? It's unconstitutional. I'm not making any phone calls overseas, or even sending e-mail out in that direction, so it's easy for me to spout my particular rhetoric. But even still, if I stand by and say nothing then one day I'll have no shoes... or something. How's that aphorism go?


I'm not much of a political activist. I see things my own way and I make my comments from the safety of a laptop miles from the action. But I voted in the last few elections specifically so I could counter the argument of "if you don't vote you can't complain," so now I'm complaining.


Fighting the war on terrorism - good thing. Use every weapon in the arsenal to hunt down these guys and put them out of our misery. But a line most assuredly must be drawn somewhere and if it isn't here then it's far too late already. The answer to the question of, "Is it ok for the government to do whatever it takes to fight terrorism?" No. Should they be allowed to wantonly set aside civil liberties in the name of this fight? No. Prevention? That comes from diligence and caution. It comes from changing the rules about who and what can come across our borders. It comes from withdrawing any outgoing funds that might be used by other countries to support terrorism.


Don't tell me that my privacy should be sacrificed for this when you're sending untold amounts of money to the very countries that are harboring these monsters. Don't sell me a line that a strip search in an airport is for my own safety when our own allies are refusing to cooperate with us in our war efforts. You want to crack down on something? Crack down on dealing with Germany or France or any other nation that has the GAWL to turn to us for support when they out and out refuse to give us any in our own time of need. We've rebuilt these nations and they are spitting on us.


I'm sorry, do I sound miffed? I guess maybe I am, a little. I'm a little tired of hearing that this is all for my own good. I'm getting tired of giving up a little more freedom each day just to hear that it's to prevent me from losing it. It's not like currency, you can't bank it for later. Once it's gone, it's gone.

"Freedom isn't free" is an over-used adage but I think the meaning is completely lost. Our freedom doesn't cost MORE freedom. Freedom is bought by the sacrifice of men and women who would choose to face grave injury or death in order that others may continue to live a life of liberty. THAT is the cost - not this pap that we're being handed by officials who want more power. Every inch we give might as well be a flag of surrender.


If we do not start taking action right this very minute we are going to lose this war. And I'm not talking about Iraq and I'm not talking about terrorism. I'm talking about the war for freedom that we fight every time we go to an airport or walk through a public place or drive on a public street. I'm talking about the war we fight every time we make a "private" phone call and every time we send an e-mail. Every time we visit a web site, every time we have a conversation about our opinions, every time we tune in to a radio station or read a newspaper or watch a television show we are fighting to keep the right to do so. And if we let them, the government WILL decide that all of it should be regulated and filtered by them, and our freedom of choice will be reduced to a smoldering heap of nothing at all.


J. Kevin Tumlinson is the Editor of ViewOnline Magazine at www.viewonline.com. He is a Producer and a Writer for his production company, Hat Digital Media (www.hatdigitalmedia.com). He feels free to make prank phone calls to Osama Bin Laden.

Tuesday, January 17, 2006

Piles

I am a newlywed. Don't everyone gasp at once, it wasn't that unexpected. I mean, sure, I was thirty-three before I finally found "the one" and settled down. And yes, there were all kinds of whispers and pointed comments about whether or not I'd ever get off of the "Single Train." Naysayers all, but in the end I found a keeper - a wonderful, beautiful, intelligent woman who can actually put up with my puerile, juvenile behavior.

Now that the "hard part" is done - I've found the girl, taken the vows, introduced the cats - it's time to get to the "impossible part." Combining our stuff.

I have a lot of stuff. Call it a hobby, but I've been collecting stuff since birth. And sadly, I have to admit that I still have most of the stuff that's ever passed through my stubby little fingers. After thirty-three years of collecting, the piles have gotten unreasonably tall, unfathomably deep, and alarming wobbly. Now enter Kara.

Kara, at a scant 29-years-old, has nevertheless managed to accumulate a great deal of stuff herself. Maybe not on the grand scale of my ode to materialism, but she remains a competitor.

By ourselves, we are individuals with a lot stuff. Together, we are a couple with a monstrous mountain of things that threatens to cave in on us at any given moment. We are charged with the nearly impossible chore of sorting, organizing, and placing each of the myriad items in our possession. It's an overwhelming task. Our sanity is threatened.

It's times like these when I begging to wonder if maybe it's just not worth it. Should we, perhaps, consider getting rid of our stuff? I mean, the idea of a much simpler existence, devoid of heavy boxes to move and a million small items to dust, does appeal to me. Perhaps we should go the other extreme and sell everything we own, donate what won't sell, and live a Spartan and simple existence. Amish-like in it's simplicity.

Could I do that? I'm not sure. It does have a certain appeal. But would I be able to make that final decision? Could I say, once and for all, "I'm done. World, have at it! Take what you want and leave me only what I need to survive?"

Probably not. But maybe there's no need to go to such an extreme. Maybe all I really need is to just cull the pile a little. Get the clutter under control. Get rid of the non-essentials in as many areas as I can stand.

It's going to take forever. Heck, maybe I'll just keep it all.

J. Kevin Tumlinson is the editor of ViewOnline Magazine and a freelance writer. He is the owner of the production company, Hat Digital Media. He is hiding in the piles of clutter because he feels safe there.

 
     

Home | About Us | Contact Us | Archives | Classic ViewPoint Archives | VO Shop